Inject sincerity and transparency to avoid chieftaincy disputes- Prince Mba

Date:

Share post:

Mr Prince Bagnaba Mba, President of Forum for Equity, a human rights organization has called on Kingmakers to exhibit higher level of transparency and sincerity in their traditional adjudications to avoid chieftaincy disputes.


That, he added demanded integrity and strong-heartedness to decipher the truth from deceit to create a conducive atmosphere for peaceful co-existence.


“Chieftaincy disputes are not easily resolved because of lack of transparency and sincerity of elders in the royal court who act as advisors and Kingmakers.


“Contestants to any stool or skin should also be subjected to DNA test to ascertain true blue blood or royalty”.


Mr Mba who was speaking to the Ghana news Agency on chieftaincy issues in Ghana has attributed political interference and corruption as the root causes of conflict, which enabled non-royals with political influence to ‘hijack the age longed traditional system of government’.


He said such conflicts created unnecessary and avoidable crisis leading to loss of lives and property and halted and grounded economic activities.


“It is only true sons and daughters who are entitled to inheritance, but the present manipulative approach casts doubts about eligibility.

It’s really unwelcoming to have two or more chiefs contesting for authentication”.


He said monies spent on chieftaincy trouble spots could easily be used for industrialization to create jobs and stabilize the economy.


Political elites, youth groups, and local politicians in Ghana have all used chieftaincy conflicts to further their political and economic goals with reasonable levels of success.


Political actors recognise that chiefs are crucial allies in winning elections.

And it goes both ways.

Candidates for chieftaincy positions rely on the backing of local and national leaders to help them achieve control over a traditional area.


Therefore reverence for chieftaincy comes under threat in so far as subjects consider chiefs as political tools.


The ultimate danger is the weakening of state institutions and the continuation of violence which invariably affects development and democracy.

In resolving chieftaincy conflicts and stopping their politication the various houses of chiefs should be empowered and be the only institution for handling chieftaincy issues.

Secondly, there is a need to codify the lines of succession in Ghana.

Related articles

Apple iPhone sales dip despite AI rollout

Sales of Apple iPhones dropped at the end of last year, as the tech firm's roll out of...

Canada and Mexico face 25% tariffs on Saturday, Trump says

US President Donald Trump has said he will follow through with his threat to hit imports from Canada...

‘Spurs don’t need to buy anyone – just play the kids’

After no wins in seven in the Premier League, Ange Postecoglou's team struggled against Swedish qualifiers Elfsborg in...

GCB Bank provides 3 million cedis Lifeline for Katamanto, Techiman Market Fire Victims

GCB Bank PLC has rolled out a special loan package for its Micro and Small Enterprise (MSE) customers...